Cloud Security Compare

Orca vs Upwind: agentless-first or runtime-first cloud security?

Cloud Security Compare editors · Matchups reviewed September 2026 · Editorial assessment

The short version

Orca Security scores higher, 4.2 to 3.9, and wins five of seven criteria. Upwind wins the one that defines it, runtime protection depth (4.7 against 3.8), built on eBPF sensors and cloud activity baselines. Pick Upwind if detection and response inside running workloads is the main job; pick Orca if coverage without agents and stronger code-to-cloud tooling matter more.

Orca Security

4.2/ 5

Upwind

3.9/ 5

Overall weighted total: Orca 4.2, Upwind 3.9. Orca stronger by 0.3.OrcaUpwind4.23.9evenOrca +0.3

Orca Security wins 5 criteria, Upwind wins 1, 1 tied.

What is the verdict?

This is the clearest design contrast in the matrix. Orca starts from agentless SideScanning and adds an optional sensor; Upwind starts from a runtime sensor and adds agentless scanning. The scores follow the design: Orca is 0.9 behind on runtime and 0.9 ahead on agentless coverage. Orca also leads on code security, where Upwind lists IaC, SCA and DAST but not SAST, and on ecosystem, where Upwind is the younger company, founded in October 2022.

How do Orca and Upwind compare on each criterion?

Agentless coverage and time to value

Weight 18%

Agentless coverage and time to value: Orca 4.9, Upwind 4.0. Orca stronger by 0.9.OrcaUpwind4.94.0evenOrca +0.9

Orca: SideScanning reads workload block storage out of band and covers VMs, containers and serverless across six clouds, including Oracle, Alibaba and Tencent.

Upwind: Agentless scanning is part of the platform, though Upwind's design centers on its runtime sensor.

Runtime protection depth

Weight 16%

Runtime protection depth: Orca 3.8, Upwind 4.7. Upwind stronger by 0.9.OrcaUpwind3.84.7evenUpwind +0.9

Orca: The eBPF Orca Sensor adds runtime detections and can terminate processes, but it is an optional layer and less proven than runtime-first rivals.

Upwind: eBPF sensors, baselines of cloud activity and network flows, and forensic event timelines; Upwind says it detects threats in 15 seconds.

Risk prioritization and attack paths

Weight 18%

Risk prioritization and attack paths: Orca 4.8, Upwind 4.5. Orca stronger by 0.3.OrcaUpwind4.84.5evenOrca +0.3

Orca: Dynamic risk scoring and attack path analysis on one data model built from full agentless context.

Upwind: Correlates static findings with runtime context for attack path and exposure analysis; Upwind claims 93% noise reduction.

Code-to-cloud and AppSec

Weight 14%

Code-to-cloud and AppSec: Orca 4.4, Upwind 3.8. Orca stronger by 0.6.OrcaUpwind4.43.8evenOrca +0.6

Orca: SCA, SAST, secrets, IaC and image scanning with GitHub, GitLab and Azure DevOps, plus cloud-to-code tracing that opens pull requests.

Upwind: IaC security, SCA and SBOM, DAST and a container admission controller; SAST is not among its listed modules.

AI workload security

Weight 12%

AI workload security: Orca 4.6, Upwind 4.4. Orca stronger by 0.2.OrcaUpwind4.64.4evenOrca +0.2

Orca: AI-SPM inventory, shadow AI discovery, MCP server monitoring and AI AppGen Security for apps built on AI app builders.

Upwind: AI inventory, AI-BOM, AI-SPM, an AI sensor, AI detection and response, and offensive testing for models, agents and MCP servers.

Ecosystem and integrations

Weight 12%

Ecosystem and integrations: Orca 4.1, Upwind 3.5. Orca stronger by 0.6.OrcaUpwind4.13.5evenOrca +0.6

Orca: Covers the source-control and CI/CD tools buyers expect, but its partner and market footprint is smaller than Wiz's or the platform vendors'.

Upwind: A younger company (founded October 2022, 150+ customers per its newsroom) with a smaller partner and integration footprint.

Pricing transparency

Weight 10%

Pricing transparency: Orca 1.5, Upwind 1.5. Tied at 1.5.OrcaUpwind1.51.5evenEven

Orca: No public price list; the pricing URL returns a 404 and quotes go through sales.

Upwind: No public price list; the pricing URL returns a 404.

Scores are 0 to 5. The marker leans toward the stronger vendor; a gap of 1.5 or more pins it to the end. How to read these bars

What are the key differences?

FactOrca SecurityUpwind
DeploymentAgentless SideScanning of workload block storage; optional Orca Sensor for runtimeAgentless scanning combined with eBPF runtime sensors
Runtime sensorOrca Sensor, eBPF-based, Linux, Kubernetes and Windows; can be configured to terminate processeseBPF sensor; CDR with cloud activity baselines and forensic timelines
Clouds namedAWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, Tencent CloudAWS, Google Cloud, Azure, OCI (named as partners)
Code securitySCM posture, SCA, SAST, secrets, IaC and container image scanning; GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps; cloud-to-code tracing into pull requestsIaC security, SCA and SBOM, DAST, container admission controller
AI securityAI-SPM (models, pipelines, training data, AI packages), shadow AI, MCP server monitoring, AI AppGen Security (unveiled ahead of Black Hat USA 2026)AI inventory, AI-BOM, AI-SPM, AI sensor, AI detection and response, offensive testing for models, agents and MCP servers
OwnershipStandalone vendorStandalone vendor; founded October 2022 in San Francisco; $250 million Series B announced 26 January 2026
Public pricingNot published. Contact sales.Not published. Contact sales.
Open-source projectNone namedNone named

Orca Security sources: Orca platform · SideScanning · Orca Sensor · Application security · AI security · AI AppGen Security · Reviewed Sep 2026

Upwind sources: Upwind home · Upwind newsroom · AI security platform · CDR · Reviewed Sep 2026

When should you pick Orca?

  • You need coverage of every account quickly and do not want to roll out a sensor first.
  • Your estate includes Oracle, Alibaba or Tencent Cloud.
  • Code-to-cloud remediation through pull requests is part of the plan.

When should you pick Upwind?

  • Most of your risk sits in Kubernetes and containers, and you want detection and forensics inside them.
  • You want runtime context to decide which findings matter; Upwind says this cuts noise by 93%.
  • You want offensive testing of AI models, agents and MCP servers in the same platform.

What do buyers get wrong about this matchup?

Buyers sometimes read "runtime-first" as "agent-only". Upwind also scans without agents, and Orca also sells an eBPF sensor that can terminate processes. The real question is which side each vendor has invested in longer. A second trap is comparing vendor speed claims, such as Upwind's "15 seconds to detect", as if they were measured the same way. They are vendor statements; test them in a proof of concept.

Frequently asked questions

Is Upwind agentless?

Partly. Upwind combines agentless scanning with eBPF runtime sensors. Its runtime depth, where it outscores Orca, comes from the sensor.

Does Orca have runtime protection?

Yes. The Orca Sensor is eBPF-based, runs on Linux, Kubernetes and Windows, and can be configured to terminate processes. We score it 3.8 against Upwind's 4.7.

How much has Upwind raised?

Upwind's newsroom lists a $250 million Series B announced on 26 January 2026 and a $100 million Series A announced on 2 December 2024.

Related comparisons

Matchups reviewed September 2026. Found an error? editors@cloudsecuritycompare.com